A litigant who believed a court was using AI to summarize filings buried hidden instructions in his documents to see whether a machine would follow them. The stunt has judges asking how to detect prompt injection in the record.
Read full story →-49Net Negative
▲Opportunity22/100
Surfacing an undisclosed judicial reliance on AI summarization creates pressure for courts to adopt disclosure rules and prompt-injection detection before the practice becomes entrenched and invisible.
▼Risk71/100
A litigant can steer a court's AI-assisted reading of the record with hidden text, meaning real cases could be adjudicated on instructions no judge or opposing counsel ever sees.